Add links to review

README.md

@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
-# Review #1
+# Review no. 1
 
 I didn't touch Imba for a while and I'm really happy with what it
-became. CSS syntax totally nails it! I played a bit with imba2
+became. CSS syntax totally nails it! I played a bit with Imba2
 and here are my notes:
 
 ## require / import
 
 I used to write:
 
-```js
+```coffee
 let helpers =
   method1: require('lodash.method2')
   method2: require('lodash.method2')
@@ -16,9 +16,9 @@ let helpers =
   method9: require('somelib.method9')
 ```
 
-There's no inline equivalent of import and I need to write it like this:
+There's no `inline` import equivalent and I need to write it like this:
 
-```js
+```coffee
 import method1 from 'lodash.method1'
 import method2 from 'lodash.method2'
 ...
@@ -27,18 +27,20 @@ import method9 from 'somelib.method9'
 let helpers = { method1, method2 ... method9 }
 ```
 
-Not terrible. Require was more predictable though and if it's not a big
+Not terrible. `require` was more predictable though and if it's not a big
-deal it would be nice to have both - require and import. There's a
+deal it would be nice to have both - `require` and `import`. There's a
 chance it would be just an alias in existing implementation.
 
-Also with import syntax it would be nice to have syntax like this:
+Also with `import` syntax it would be nice to have syntax like this:
 
-```js
+```coffee
 import { method1, method2 ... method3 } as helpers from 'lodash'
 ```
 
-_Side note:_ Actually I had random issues with importing from lodash and I finished
+_Side note:_ Actually I had random issues with importing from `lodash` and I finished
-with using lodash-es library.
+with using `lodash-es` library.
+
+[Issue](https://github.com/imba/imba/issues/793)
 
 ## assigning attributes to self
 
@@ -58,25 +60,32 @@ class Dog
 ```
 
 And I miss it here even Imba was forked from Coffeescript years ago.
-It could be `@` or `$` prefix or `!` postfix.
+It could be `@` or `$` prefix or `!` postfix to tell that argument should be assigned to `self`.
+
+[Issue](https://github.com/imba/imba/issues/795)
 
 ## No errors in browser while having syntax error in imba file
 
 I've been few times confused what happen after having a typo in source
 file. Then I find through browser tools that the file is simply not
 attached to the bundle. It would be much faster for a developer to have
-an error notive displayed in browser.
+an error notice displayed in browser.
 
-## I miss :symbols from Imba1
+[Issue](https://github.com/imba/imba/issues/796)
 
-```js
+## I miss pseudo :symbols from Imba1
+
+```coffee
 :symbol # => 'symbol'
 ```
 It was really small feature but I loved to use it. Why to drop it?
 
+[Issue](https://github.com/imba/imba/issues/797)
+
 ## one-word webcomponents
 
-I had an issue described here. Looks like you can't name a tag starting
+I had an issue described [here](https://discord.com/channels/682180555286380545/1019638724188979250/threads/1062282410542239765).
+Looks like you can't name a tag starting
 with a small letter if it's one word. The problem is
 - I have read whole documentation before writing anything and
 didn't notice it - even it's written there. It could be more emphasised.
@@ -89,11 +98,13 @@ I occured a situation it doesn't work as expected.
 Considering above I suggest allow such naming and implicitly convert it
 to web-component name, like `x-name`.
 
+[Issue](https://github.com/imba/imba/issues/798)
+
 ## one line variable or prop declarations
 
-Probably it was already discussed. Proposal:
+Proposal:
 
-```
+```coffee
 let a, b, c
 
 # is equal to:
@@ -120,14 +131,16 @@ let c = 1
 # and so on...
 ```
 
+[Issue](https://github.com/imba/imba/issues/799)
+
 ## short form of loops
 
 By skipping var name declaration and giving them default values (`el`, `i`, `key`, `v`) and also by
-skipping `for` keyword we could have a shortcut syntax for `for` loops.
+skipping `for` keyword we could have a short syntax for `for` loops.
 
-Examples accordingly after documentation[link]:
+Examples accordingly after documentation[link](https://imba.io/docs/basic-syntax/control-flow#forin-loops):
 
-```
+```coffee
 el * 2 in [1,2,3]
 # num * 2 for num in [1,2,3]
 
@@ -166,23 +179,21 @@ console.log "{key} is {v}" of obj
 # console.log "{key} is {value}" for own key,value of obj
 ```
 
-## [bug] deleting or adding `extend tag` / `tag` definitions
+[Issue](https://github.com/imba/imba/issues/800)
-
-for some cases spins vite crazy (consumes whole processor) and requires restart.
 
 ## [bug] no .gitignore in Vite template (after imba create)
 
 I didn't noticed and added whole node\_modules in initial commit to the
 repo.
 
-link to PR
+[PR](https://github.com/imba/imba/pull/794)
 
 ### Pro-router integration
 
 This is result of my short play with Imba2: [pro-router-imba2](https://router.maniak.pr/imba2).
 I'm thinking about introducing syntax `?` for operating with url params:
 
-```
+```coffee
 # url: /books/id/1
 
 ?id # => 1
@@ -199,3 +210,5 @@ I'm thinking about introducing syntax `?` for operating with url params:
 
 Both keeps router getters and setters in loop. Also I give you for
 consideration to introduce such syntax in Imba by default.
+
+[Issue](https://github.com/imba/imba/issues/801)